Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Knox v. Soignet et al
as 2:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Stephen Bergeron, Tim Soignet and Rhonda Ledet
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leatherman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe, Michael Sizemore and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Leatherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donohue v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2020cv04278
Defendant:
Wellstar Health Care Group, Cobb County Detention Center and Cobb County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFWALT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80002
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD EDWARD HOFWALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEABODY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58556
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD EDWARD PEABODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2020cv01737
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter, Tim Soignet and Jason Pelligrin
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLCUTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97465
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD EDWARD WILLCUTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD EDWARD ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. United States of America
as 19-3773
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chad Edwards
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Edwards v. Dorel Home Furnishings, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Dorel Home Furnishings, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Chad Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
