Cases 1 - 10 of 3,186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Natkunanathan v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary Department of Homeland Security and others
Bamba v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS-FPS)
as 23-7380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIANKANZE BAMBA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and CHAD WOLF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
AGANAN et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2023cv21410
Plaintiff:
RIZZA JANE GUANAO AGANAN, ALBERT BOAMPONG, HECTOR GARCIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01663
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01638
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
