Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Chalk v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03114
Plaintiff:
Curtis Alexander Chalk
Defendant:
Ms. Anderson, Paula Smith and Edward F. Basden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Masumaga et al
as 4:2020cv07832
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
K. Morgan, William Davis, Lure J. Masumaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lewis v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2020cv06112
Defendant:
Sheriff David Livingston, Contra Costa County, Jason Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lewis v. Contra Costa County et al
as 1:2020cv01195
Defendant:
Tom Chalk, Contra Costa County, Jason Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
County Mayor Jimmy Sain, Dr. Larry Bloomingburg, Nicole Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Perez D. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Chalk
as 1:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
Chase Edward Lucas
Defendant:
Allen Chalk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Chalk
as 3:2018cv01031
Plaintiff:
Chase Edward Lucas
Defendant:
Allen Chalk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. New York State Department of C
as 18-1787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William D. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Robert Cunningham, Lieutenant Holloran and SORC Nicholas Chalk, Hearing Officer Woodbourne Correctional Facility
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Hearing Officer Woodbourne Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00845
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Keenan Wilkins v. County of Contra Costa, et al
as 17-16274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, Sheriff, VANDERLIND, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
