Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Harrison v. Tovar
as 6:2026cv00432
Petitioner:
Chance A. Harrison, Sr.
Respondent:
Joe Tovar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cone et al v. Clifford Chance LLP
as 1:2026cv05508
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cone and Michael Sabin
Defendant:
Clifford Chance LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Tezak-ESERVICE v. Lacasse, et al.
as 26-4094
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARTIN TEZAK-ESERVICE
Defendant:
LEONARD JOSPEH LACASSE, MARK ROBERT NAREAU, DOUGLAS MARSHALL PROUTY and others
Hudson v. Buttel et al
as 6:2026cv01200
Defendant:
John Chance, Lucian Buttel, John Burdick and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Hudson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Amedee v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2026cv01379
Plaintiff:
Stephen Amedee, Jr.
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, The Brewer House for Second Chances, LLC and Vyntrella Menzies
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
(HC) Chance v. De La Cruz
as 1:2026cv04904
Petitioner:
Leslie Jenea Chance
Respondent:
A. De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chance v. Sheehy Fredericksburg, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01759
Plaintiff:
James H. Chance
Defendant:
Sheehy Fredericksburg, LLC doing business as Sheehy Toyota of Fredericksburg, Sheehy Auto Stores, Inc. and Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Credit Repair Organization Act
Uptmore v. United States of America
as 5:2026cv03781
Plaintiff:
Chance Anthony Uptmore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jace Yarbrough v. B. Saltzman
as 26-5187
Plaintiff:
Jace Yarbrough
Defendant:
B. Chance Saltzman, in his personal capacity
Schaper v. Andes
as 3:2026cv03250
Petitioner:
Oliver Schaper
Respondent:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
