Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Chapman v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tina Chapman
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chapman v. Covil et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mitch Chapman
Defendant:
Max H Covil, Arizona, State of, Barb Kiffmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Kylene Kaye Chapman
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Seabert et al
as 2:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Defendant:
D Seabert, J Hickman, D Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federman v. Widmar et al
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Max Federman
Defendant:
Mark Widmar, Michael J Ahearn, Richard D Chapman and others
Chapman v. Ryan
as 2:2021cv01512
Plaintiff:
Kevin Chapman
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, David Shinn, Centurion of Arizona LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jacksen v. Chapman Automotive Group LLC
as 2:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Chapman Automotive Group LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Chapman Volkswagen Scottsdale Arizona
Plaintiff:
Megan Jacksen
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Schultz v. Chapman Scottsdale Autoplex LLC
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Chapman Scottsdale Autoplex LLC doing business as Chapman Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram
Plaintiff:
David Schultz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tauscher et al v. Donison et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Joseph Kreamer, VIP Mortgage, Benjamin Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M Tauscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
