Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Charles Thornton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY JO ZIMMER, Nurse Practitioner, HCU at Menard CC and MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Thornton v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles E Thornton
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pimenta et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta, Heather Staples and Pedro Miguel Da Silva Pimenta
Defendant:
City of Eclectic, Charles Thornton and Charles T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thornton v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2020cv00518
Defendant:
C/O Dryden, Jacqueline Lashbrook, John Does, 1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50138
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Doe
as 3:2019cv01371
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Thornton v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 19-3303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GAIL WALLS, JUANITA HOUSE, LEE GREGSON and others
Thornton v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, New and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
