Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Joshua Payne v. Charles Butts, et al
as 22-2210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA I. PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BUTTS, Religious Accommodation Review Committee, ELISHA FRIENDMAN, Religious Accommodation Review Committee, MARYANN ROBBINS, Religious Accommodation Review Committee and others
Defendant:
JODY SMITH, Religious Accommodation Review Committee
Payne v. Butts et al
as 3:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Payne
Defendant:
Charles Butts, Crig Copper, Margaret Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02357
Defendant:
Huffman, Scott Miller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ndokey Enow v. Richard Dovey
as 17-6819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NDOKEY ENOW
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD DOVEY, Warden, IAN BRYANT, CHARLES BUTTS and others
Sotero Ortiz v. Charles Butts, et al
as 16-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOTERO ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES BUTTS and JOSEPH BISCOE
Keziah v. Krestes et al
as 3:2015cv02171
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keziah
Defendant:
Krestes, Charles Butts, Kevin S Rakus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramer v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2015cv01360
Plaintiff:
William Cramer
Defendant:
John Kerestes , Michael Damore , Charles Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Butts et al
as 4:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sotero Ortiz
Defendant:
Charles Butts and Joseph Biscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
