Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cannon v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 5:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
Charles Cannon
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv07839
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CANNON
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. Bristol - Myers Squibb Company et al
as 2:2018cv02223
Plaintiff:
Charles Cannon
Defendant:
Bristol - Myers Squibb Company, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archey et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 4:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Vivian Archey , Glennos Carter , Minnie Carter and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , AstraZeneca LP , Astra USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv09691
Plaintiff:
Charles Cannon
Defendant:
The City Of New York , and New York City Transit Authority
Cross_claimant:
New York City Transit Authority and The City Of New York ,
Cross_defendant:
The City Of New York and New York City Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28146
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown and Charles Cannon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benton, et al v. Warner-Lambert, et al
as 1:2003cv06399
Plaintiff:
Elbert Benton, Clyde Brown, Cathy Carter and others
Petitioner:
Stanley Discount Drugs
Defendant:
Warner-Lambert Co., Alice Bonar, Don's Drugs and others
Cross Claimant:
Wayne Byrd and J. C. Matthews, III
Cross Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
