Cases 1 - 10 of 45
USA v. Charles Cunningham
as 23-12694
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES CUNNINGHAM
Cunningham v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Richard Charles Cunningham
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cunningham v. Mimms,City Manager et al
as 2:2022cv14232
Plaintiff:
Charles Cunningham
Defendant:
Nicholas Mimms,City Manager, Kenny Norris, Juan Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cunningham v. USA
as 2:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Richard Charles Cunningham, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CUNNINGHAM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17181
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Chief Prosecutor Tom Wine, Elizabeth Brown Jones, Detective Ryan Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Brice Jamar Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04540
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY CHARLES CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUNNINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01227
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Manlove et al
as 2:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Belinda Shrubbe, Gail Waltz, Sumnicht and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Cunningham, Jr.In re: Richard Cunningham, Jr.
as 19-11067
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
