Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HOBECK et al
as 2:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, ESQUIRE JUDITH POTOKA PETRUSH and FRANK J PALLONE JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73169
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL STEPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20759
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DARNELL SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Reyes et al v. Darnell et al
as 4:2018cv03994
Plaintiff:
Darlene Reyes and Humberto Reyes
Defendant:
Charles Darnell, Enterprise Holdings, Inc., Ean Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davis
as 4:2018cv02813
Petitioner:
Charles Darnell Smith
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Charles Yocum
as 16-4277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles Darnell Yocum
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Charles Yocum
as 10-1043
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles Darnell Yocum
Mitchell et al v. Beshear et al
as 5:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell, Glenn Dean, Paul Miller and others
Defendant:
Steve Beshear, Michael Brown, LaDonna Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
