Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Adkisson et al v. Welch et al
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Larry M Adkisson, James T Buchanan, Jad Mubarak and others
Defendant:
Karen Welch, Larenda D McCormick, Michael W Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Bradley Charles Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Davis v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Angela Davis and Charles Davis
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, McKesson Corporation and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01101
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ardith Davis and Charles Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2019cv10881
Defendant:
Stephen Woodcock, Joseph Gasper, Larry Biniecki and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Davis v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2019cv10569
Defendant:
Stephen Woodcock, Joseph Gasper, Larry Biniecki and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Davis, et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv02056
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis and Mary Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce Meyers, et al v. Village of Oxford, et al
as 17-2169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE MEYERS, KALLIE ROESNER-MEYERS and EUGENIA CALOCASSIDES
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF OXFORD, JOE YOUNG, SUE BOSSARDET and others
USA v. Daequon Davis
as 17-5864
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAEQUON CHARLES DAVIS
Meyers et al v. Oxford, Village of et al
as 2:2017cv10623
Defendant:
Oxford, Village of , Joe Young , Sue Bossardet and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Meyers , Kallie Roesner-Meyers and Eugenia Calocassides
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
