Cases 1 - 10 of 83
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEACH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25140
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS BEACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houghton et al v. Leshner et al
as 3:2022cv07781
Plaintiff:
Amanda Houghton, Charles Douglas and Susan Franklin
Defendant:
Robert Leshner, Geoffrey Hayes, Compound DAO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Yoder v. Prince et al
as 3:2022cv02004
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Yoder
Defendant:
Prince, Jonathan Winters, Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Bright
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Yoder v. David et al
as 3:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Yoder
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Brandon Edwards, Daniel Monti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens et al v. Hayes et al
as 1:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Owens, II and Jess Lee Green
Defendant:
Lawanda Hayes, Ronnie Lampley, Georgia Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rajohn Charles Douglas v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2021cv07008
Petitioner:
Rajohn Charles Douglas
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEDEMA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS MEDEMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
