Cases 11 - 20 of 21
United States of America v. Malone
as 2:2014cv01221
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Philip Charles Malone
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Malone
as 2:2014at00631
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Philip Charles Malone
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Malone v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Charles Malone
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson v. Jackson et al
as 7:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Otis Thompson
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Missy Homan-Hibbett, John H Wilkerson, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Malone v. Butler et al
as 6:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Charles Malone
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Donald Skipper, Jeremy Fields and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Vail et al
as 3:2010cv05205
Plaintiff:
James A. Battle, Jr.
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Earl X. Wright, Dawn Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Vail et al
as 2:2010cv00343
Plaintiff:
James A Battle, Jr
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Earl Wright, Dawn Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00080
Petitioner:
Charles Malone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Malone v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00696
Plaintiff:
Charles Malone
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Teasdale et al v. Heck et al
as 2:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
Karen C Teasdale and Steven L Teasdale
Defendant:
Robert T Heck, Robert T Heck, Columbus Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
