Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MEEKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18468
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MEEKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Albin v. Louisville Metro Government, et al
as 22-5285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN ALBIN
Defendant:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER CHARLES MEEK, In his Individual and Official Capacities and OFFICER MICHAEL PUGH, In his Individual and Official Capacities
MEEKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03401
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albin v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2019cv00576
Defendant:
Chief Steve Conrad, Officer Charles Meek, Louisville Metro Government and others
Plaintiff:
John Albin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Meek v. Zopan et al
as 6:2017cv00227
Petitioner:
Charles Meek
Respondent:
State of Oregon, Natalie Jean Zitik and Jenice Zopan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Meeks v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
as 16-15536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MEEKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Meeks v. OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC
as 9:2016cv81003
Plaintiff:
Charles Meeks
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carver et al v. City of Louisville, Kentucky et al
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Carver and Amanda Price
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03531
Plaintiff:
Barbara Simon, Barbara Simon, Andrea York and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
