Cases 1 - 10 of 13
POULSON v. SMITH, et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POULSON
Defendant:
KIM SMITH, NURSE LESLIE and NURSE FERDARKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Poulson et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv04638
Plaintiff:
Donna Poulson and Charles Poulson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poulson et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
Donna Poulson and Charles Poulson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POULSON v. RUMCIK
as 1:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POULSON
Defendant:
ROBERT RUMCIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POULSON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv07665
Petitioner:
CHARLES POULSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Polite, et al v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE E. POLITE, GREGORY STOVER, RAYMOND WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTY GEN PA
POLITE et al v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv04344
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent:
PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLITE et al v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2010cv03286
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POULSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00268
Petitioner:
CHARLES POULSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: In Re: Charles Poulson
as 09-2623
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES POULSON, JR.
Respondent:
COMM OF PA, ATTY GEN PA, DA BUCKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
