Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00780
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Al-Azim et al v. Everett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00339
Plaintiff: Raheem S. Al-Azim, Charles X and Victor X
Defendant: J. Everett, R. W. Younce, V. M. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. GORMALLY et al
as 8:2013mc00112
Respondent: CHARLES X. GORMALLY, CATHY CHRISTINA CARDILLO and SEAN ALDEN SMITH
Johnathan Smith v. Gene Johnson
as 13-6621
Party-in-Interest - Appellant: JOHNATHAN LEE X SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan Lee Smith, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith
Plaintiff: MUWAKKIL S. B. SHABAZZ, a/k/a Antonio Finney, KHALID MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Stephen Lorenzo Cook, GERONIMO MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Jerome B. Richardson and others
Defendant - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, sued individually and officially, JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, sued individually and officially, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director, sued individually and officially and others
Defendant: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LINDA SHEAR, Chief Dietician, sued individually and officially, PUBLICATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, sued individually and officially and others
X et al v. Everett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00739
Plaintiff: Johnathan Lee X, Raheem S. Al-Azim, Charles X and others
Defendant: J. Everett, R. W. Younce, V. M. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz et al v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00638
Plaintiff: Muwakkil S. B. Shabazz, Khalid Muhammad, Geronimo Muhammad and others
Defendant: Virginia Department of Corrections, Linda Shear, Gene M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?