Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC v. LOVELL et al
as 5:2022cv04617
Plaintiff:
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN LOVELL and CHARMING CHARLIE MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Broadstone Land, LLC, v. Charming Charlie Markets, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Broadstone Land, LLC
Defendant:
Charming Charlie Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Regency Court, L.L.C. v. Charming Charlie Big Red, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Regency Court, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Charming Charlie Big Red, LLC and Charming Charlie Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Brinkman v. Charming Charlie LLC
as 2:2018cv06377
Defendant:
Charming Charlie LLC
Plaintiff:
April Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc. v. Charming Charlie LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08717
Defendant:
Charming Charlie Holdings, Inc., Charming Charlie LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
