Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
ANGUS v. USA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2012cv00997
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. ANGUS
Defendant:
USA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ZINETA DEDOVIC, JACK LUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00540
Plaintiff:
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281
Neal v. Duke Energy et al
as 6:2011cv01420
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Charter Communications
as 6:2011cv00830
Plaintiff:
Missey Thomas
Defendant:
Charter Communications
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sunbelt Mobile Home Park LLC v. Charter Communications Inc et al
as 6:2011cv00708
Plaintiff:
Sunbelt Mobile Home Park LLC
Defendant:
Charter Communications Inc and Charter Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. RCN Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
RCN Corporation , Verizon Communications, Inc. , Comcast Corporation and others
Counter_claimant:
RCN Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Bear Creek Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
