Cases 31 - 40 of 632
Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
as 23-16076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJALI WARD and LILA CAST
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH LAWRENCE, SUZANNE PORTER, AKA Suzanne Thompson, DANIEL DANSIE and others
Rogers et al v. DeLeon et al
as 4:2023cv03726
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Rogers and Coastal Preserve LLC
Defendant:
Suzanne DeLeon, Todd Ajari, Michelle Battaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05654
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smoulder LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04489
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Smoulder LLC doing business as Smolder, Yakub Chaus and Waheeduddin Syed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
as 23-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJALI WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH LAWRENCE, CHAU NGUYEN, MARK ROBISON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
