Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 236
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff: Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant: Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chica-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-509
Petitioner: ANA CARMELINA CHICA-PINEDA and GRESMARY ANGELY GUARANGO-CHICA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10843
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03462
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Reyes v. Chica
as 3:2023cv02100
Plaintiff: Guadalupe Reyes
Defendant: Michael Chica
Amicus Curiae: Ralphie Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Gutierrez v. Trate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01678
Petitioner: Daniel Chica Gutierrez
Respondent: Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Minero Chicas, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3786
Petitioner: WILLIAM RONALDO MINERO CHICAS, ALISSON VERALY ORANTES MINERO and ADRIAN EMMANUEL MINERO ORANTES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03201
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?