Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WOOLARD et al v. CARRIER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
LARRY WOOLARD and ANNE WOOLARD
Defendant:
CARRIER CORPORATION , CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (DELAWARE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Chicago Bridge & Iron
as 17-20748
Petitioner:
In re: Stone & Webster Services, L.L.C., Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware), also known as CB&I, also known as CB&I Incorporated, Shaw Services, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Jeffrey W. Terry
In Re: Chicago Bridge & Iron, et al
as 17-20748
Petitioner:
In re: STONE & WEBSTER SERVICES, L.L.C. and CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (DELAWARE), also known as CB&I, also known as CB&I Incorporated
Respondent:
JEFFREY W. TERRY
Texas United Metals, L.L.C. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware) et al
as 4:2017cv02607
Plaintiff:
Texas United Metals, L.L.C.
Garnishee:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware)
Defendant:
Bassi Luigi &C S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jones v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware)
as 3:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Bonnie R. Jones
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company et al
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Clark
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , Westinghouse Electric Company LLC , WECTEC Contractors Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fleming v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware)
as 2:2011cv00194
Plaintiff:
Erik Fleming
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
