Cases
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Chris Allen Schronce, et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Co., et al.
as SC/8:09-CV-02921
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Co
Plaintiff: Chris Allen Schronce
Schronce et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 8:2009cv02921
Plaintiff: Chris Allen Schronce and Tammi C Schronce
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, American Standard Inc, Bayer CropScience LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Shreve v. RPD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00353
Plaintiff: Kimberly Shreve
Defendant: RPD, Malcolm Huffman and Chris Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Type: Civil Rights None
Taylor v. Canton Texas Dept of Public Safety et al
as 6:2008cv00513
Plaintiff: Chris Allen Taylor
Defendant: Canton Texas Dept of Public Safety, Van Zandt County Sheriff's Dept and Kumor Rauesh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chris Sarr v. Carol Howes
as 08-2021
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRIS ALLEN SARR
Respondent - Appellee: CAROL R. HOWES, Warden
Allen v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2008cv06771
Plaintiff: Chris Allen
Defendant: City of Newburgh, Michael Pitt and Curtis Hahne
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff: James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant: Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff: James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant: ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?