Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Edwards v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03119
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
J. Bullard, Mr. Jacobs, Franklin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rogers v. Chris Rich
as 22-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DWAYNE ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS RICH and JUDGE BETTY BROWN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ERIC HOOKS and WENDELL JACKSON
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Chris Rich
as 22-7083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS RICH, STACEY CRABTREE, TODD E. ISHEE and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Chris Rich
as 22-7023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS RICH, STACEY CRABTREE, TODD E. ISHEE and others
Kirk-Bey v. NC DPS et al
as 5:2021ct03354
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdullah Kirk-Bey
Defendant:
NC DPS, Marci Crider, John Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. Rich et al
as 5:2021ct03079
Defendant:
Stacey Crabtree, Chris Rich, Robert T. Barker and others
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Salim Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. FRICK et al
as 1:2021cv00055
Defendant:
OFFICER FRICK, CHRIS RICH and CAPTAIN WILSON
Plaintiff:
DARRELL T. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75785
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS RICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRK v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CHRIS RICH, TODD ISHEE and others
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDULLAH KIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, CHRIS RICH, CAPTAIN KAREN HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
