Cases 11 - 20 of 305
Smith #233282 v. Dawdy et al
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith #233282
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Heidi Washington, Greg Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #211564 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Smith
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Jerome et al
as 4:2023cv11066
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Jerome, STF Mail Room and Brian Barton
Smith v. Popielarz et al
as 2:2023cv11065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Popielarz, Kaplanis, C. Stevenson and others
Smith v. Markwell et al
as 2:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Chad E. Markwell, Magen Oaks, Heidi Washington and others
Smith et al v. Hippo Analytics Inc. d/b/a Hippo Insurance Services et al
as 6:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Smith and Judith Ann Smith
Defendant:
Hippo Analytics Inc. d/b/a Hippo Insurance Services, Spinnaker Insurance Company and Alexis Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Hetmer et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Smith
Respondent:
Lance Hetmer and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Smith v. Jody Lamb, et al
as 22-3152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JODY LAMB, REBECCA DAVISON, WINDY LABRIE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
