Cases
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff: Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GLEASON v. FIRSTRUST BANK et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv04135
Defendant: FIRSTRUST BANK and ROBERT MARLIN
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER GLEASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horwitt v. Taran Asset Management, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01840
Defendant: Taran Asset Management, LLC, Christopher Gleason and Baseline Advisors, LLC
Plaintiff: Jed Horwitt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Johnson et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00553
Plaintiff: Bravette Johnson and Curtis Williams
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia, Jason Norton, Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff: Carlos Abreu
Defendant: Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ensley et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff: Wilber Ensley , Covey Andrews , Shamar Archer and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia , Jason Norton , Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-11433
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gleason v. Lowe's Home Centers Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00472
Plaintiff: Christopher Gleason
Defendant: Lowe's Home Centers Inc , The Quikrete Companies Inc , The Valspar Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?