Civil Rights Cases
Harper v. Gonzalez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv02169
Plaintiff: Christopher Harper and Christopher A Harper
Defendant: Sheriff Ed. Gonzalez, Chief Edison Toquica, The United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00382
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Harper v. The City of Trotwood et al
as 1:2018cv00438
Plaintiff: Christopher Harper
Defendant: The City of Trotwood and Bethany Morrisett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. The City of Trotwood et al
as 3:2018cv00218
Plaintiff: Christopher Harper
Defendant: The City of Trotwood and Bethany Morrisett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02972
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00329
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
HENDERSON et al v. Sills et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00127
Plaintiff: JAMES C HENDERSON, SR and REBECCA HENDERSON
Defendant: Howard Sills, TRACEY BOWEN, CHRISTOPHER HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. City Of North Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv00150
Defendant: City Of North Chicago, Unknown Officers & Agents and Sabet
Plaintiff: Christopher Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pearson v. Quattlebaum et al (Dale County CA # CV-2011-89)
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Pearson
Defendant: Kenneth Quattlebaum, Robert H. Brogden, Brogden Law Firm LLC and others
Movant: Clarissa Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?