Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Christopher Jenkins v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05544
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jenkins v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial Health Services Corporation, et al
as 5:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jenkins and Christopher Jenkins
Defendant:
The Moses H. Cone Memorial Health Services Corporation, The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
US v. Mark Lincoln
as 15-7125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY LINCOLN, a/k/a Johnson Harper, a/k/a Kirk Johnson, a/k/a Ben Lewis, a/k/a Kirk Lincoln, a/k/a Quinton Harper, a/k/a Christoper Jacob, a/k/a Kirk Williams, a/k/a Christopher Jenkins
Jenkins v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial Health Services Corporation, et al
as 5:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins
Defendant:
The Moses H. Cone Memorial Health Services Corporation , The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital , The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jenkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03305
Plaintiff:
Juanita Jenkins and Christopher Jenkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Warren Christopher Jenkins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jenkins et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins, Christopher Jenkins, Othelle Rhue and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint, James Slaigh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
