Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Odom et al v. Harbin et al
as 6:2017cv01265
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom and Gerald Wideman
Defendant:
Nick Harbin and Charles Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Director Charleston County Detention Center
as 5:2017cv01906
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
Director Charleston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Odom v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00682
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Jason King, Charles Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bank of the Ozarks v. Macc'J Rental Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
Bank of the Ozarks
Defendant:
Macc'J Rental Properties, LLC, Janiah Healthcare, Inc., Stephanie B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2015cv01951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Joe Riley, Keith Sumney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2014cv02441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of and South Carolina Taxpayers, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, State of South Carolina Taxpayers, People of Charleston Taxpayers and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
SCDMH Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2012cv00101
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Warrant K295040 and Warrant K380533
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Odom v. Haley et al
as 3:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Joseph Riley and General Counsel of SCDMH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
