Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Christopher LeFever v. US
as 15-7285
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROSS LEFEVER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Ross v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00563
Defendant:
County of Riverside, David Greenberg, David Greenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Sidney Marts v. Frank Bell, et al
as 13-15569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY MARTS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK BELL, GARY LEE BERGASH, KARL WAYNE LABERTEW and others
Ross v. Westchester County Jail
as 13-3858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Ross
Defendant - Appellee:
Westchester County Jail, Westchester County Medical Staff, Anthony Amicucci, Warden, Ray Rhodes, Captain and others
MARTS v. BELL et al
as 4:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY MARTS
Defendant:
FRANK BELL, GARY LEE BERGASH, KARL WAYNE LABERTEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurston v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2013cv00256
Petitioner:
Christopher Ross Thurston
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beechum v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv03265
Defendant:
Westchester County Jail, Wanda Smithson and Sergeant Brent
Plaintiff:
Marcus Beechum, Firas Yousef, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beecham et al v. Smithson et al
as 1:2012cv03264
Plaintiff:
Marcus Beecham, Firas Yousef, Kenneth Jones and others
Defendant:
Wanda Smithson and Brent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beechum et al v. Smithson et al
as 1:2012cv03263
Plaintiff:
Marcus Beechum, Firas Yousef, Kenneth Jones and others
Defendant:
Wanda Smithson and Brent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beechum et al v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv03262
Plaintiff:
Marcus Beechum, Firas Yousef, Kenneth Jones and others
Defendant:
Westchester County Jail, Wanda Smithson and Brent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
