Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Smith v. City of Beaumont
as 21-60059
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Beaumont and Wayne Penton
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Smith
Noble v. The City of Beaumont
as 1:2020cv00400
Plaintiff:
Lizabeth M Noble
Defendant:
The City of Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James York, et al v. City of Beaumont, et al
as 20-40580
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Beaumont and Chase Aaron Welch
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandy Lynn Winfrey York, Individually, James Chad York, Individually and Loreal Fultz, as Independent Administrator of, and on behalf of, The Estate of Chaz Logan York and his heirs-in law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00808
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Smith v. City of Beaumont et al
as 2:2019cv00140
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Wayne Penton and City of Beaumont
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. City of Beaumont, TX
as 1:2019cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jose J Ruiz, Sr
Defendant:
City of Beaumont, TX
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
York et al v. The City of Beaumont, et al
as 1:2018cv00522
Defendant:
Chase Aaron Welch and The City of Beaumont
Plaintiff:
James Chad York, Sandy Lynn Winfrey York and Loreal Fultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Santa Cruz v. City of Beaumont et al
as 5:2018cv02096
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, City of Beaumont and Officer Gregory Adams
Plaintiff:
Angela Santa Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Santa Cruz v. City of Beaumont et al
as 2:2018cv08427
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, City of Beaumont and Officer Gregory Adams
Plaintiff:
ANGELA SANTA CRUZ and M.L.V.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Beaumont et al
as 1:2018cv00139
Defendant:
K.G. Stevenson, Wal-mart, Cody Foote and others
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
