Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
City of Camden et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company et al
as 2:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc, The Chemours Company and others
Interested Party:
State of California, State of New Hampshire, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benton County, Mississippi et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09917
Plaintiff:
Benton County, Mississippi, City of Amory, Mississippi, City of Charleston, Mississippi and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benton County, Mississippi et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Benton County, Mississippi, City of Amory, Mississippi, City of Charleston, Mississippi and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Iuka, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46172
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Iuka, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
City of Iuka, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Iuka, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
