Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall, et al
as 23-55084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr., AKA Lonnie MoNique Williams Mootry
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY J. NIDORF JUVENILE HALL and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Williams v. Social Security
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
John Clark Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(PC) Williams-Mootry v. Benbrook et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Defendant:
P - Barker, S. Lickiss, C. Elston and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Mo'nique Williams-Mootry, Lonnie Clark Williams and Lonnie Mo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al. v. Heisner et al
as 1:2020cv07502
Defendant:
T. Miller, T. Holt-Nicholson, MacDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez, John Thompson, Fernando Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Awanata v. Nowakowski et al
as 1:2020cv07393
Defendant:
Clark Williams, Bonnie M Nowakowski, Andrew Kameros and others
Plaintiff:
Oya Awanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05144
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynn v. Brown, et al
as 19-5063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, sued as John Does 1-100, THEODORE RIESLING, an individual a/k/a Ted, KIMBERLY BIEDLER SCHUTZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY ANN LYNN
Lynn v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Purview Life Tulsa, Theodore Riesling, Phillip Feist and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Lynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
