Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lela v. Lutz et al
as 3:2026cv03337
Plaintiff:
Ioan Lela
Defendant:
Darr Lutz, . Eck, S Clarkson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aharon Hakahan v. Doris Derieux
as 26-7024
Plaintiff:
AHARON AZARYAH NEARYAH HAKAHAN
Defendant:
DORIS DERIEUX, Norfolk Ct. Reporter, KENNETH C. ALEXANDER, Mayor (Norfolk), LAWRENCE E. HOCKMAN, Detective Police Officer (0765) and others
William Lyles v. Shana Clarkson, et al
as 26-2945
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. LYLES
Defendant:
SHANA CLARKSON, KATHY ASHCRAFT and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Clarkson K.P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09335
Plaintiff:
Clarkson K.P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson J.C. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09309
Plaintiff:
Clarkson J.C.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson H.N. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09332
Plaintiff:
Clarkson H.N.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson D.H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09327
Plaintiff:
Clarkson D.H.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson A.P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09338
Plaintiff:
Clarkson A.P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson J.C. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:26-cv-09309
Defendant:
Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clarkson J.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
