Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Clay v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03331
Plaintiff:
William Clay
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CLAY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01930
Plaintiff:
TYLER CLAY
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Subin Associates, LLP
as 26-2558
Defendant:
JORGE LUPI, SUBIN ASSOCIATES, LLP, SUBIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
:
UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. and JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. PC
Jones v. Scott
as 1:2026cv01664
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Jones
Defendant:
Brian Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris et al v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv03186
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Norris, Eric Wallace, Ahmad Walton and others
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Mayor Mickell M. Lowery, Sheriff Anthony J. Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company et al
as 2:2026cv06419
Plaintiff:
Alexander Clay
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract - Insurance
James Waller v. United States
as 26-2817
Petitioner:
James Clay Waller, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Clay v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 5:2026cv00341
Plaintiff:
Cheri Clay
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
