Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2024ct03021
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) O'Brien v. CDC, et al
as 2:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Kory O'Brien
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Medical Facility, D Hurtado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copes v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
Shameek Copes
Respondent:
Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Peon et al
as 1:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
Marco-Dane Jackson
Defendant:
Kasia Crawley, Hoffman Estates Police Department, Village of Hoffman Estates, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53789
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLAYTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stith v. Johnson
as 4:2021cv00171
Petitioner:
Chloe Louise Stith
Respondent:
Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32521
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIK CLAYTON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00239
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
