Cases 11 - 20 of 5,434
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cheek v. Admiral Valve, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06666
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Admiral Valve, LLC, Air Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
David Ortman
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06672
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Peet
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
JOHN FYNES, ET AL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv03398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FYNES and MARYANN FYNES
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., Bayer Cropscience, INc. (f/k/a Aventis CropScience USA Inc., f/k/a Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Inc., a/k/a Amchem Products, Inc.) unknown Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. unknown Am, CBS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,, CONWED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
