Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cleveland v. Penzone
as 2:2021cv01935
Plaintiff:
Jaytren M Cleveland
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
as 2:2021cv00884
Defendant:
Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
Plaintiff:
Danielle Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cook #207197 v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Yarrow Cook
Defendant:
William R Thomas, Amber Puckett, Trinity Services Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 et al v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2021cv00670
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Yarrow Cook, Tonatihu Aguilar, Steven A Benavidez and others
Defendant:
Amber Puckett, Trinity Services Group, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Cochise, County of et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Willcox, City of, Cochise County Sheriff's Department, Willcox Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Walter L Cleveland, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04179
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finton v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02319
Plaintiff:
Jenae Finton
Defendant:
Lisa Lantz, Ryan Lantz and Cleveland Indians Baseball Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gill, Jr. v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2018cv00617
Defendant:
Unknown Clark, Unknown Kohls, Cochise County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
George Cleveland Gill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milks v. Cleveland
as 3:2018cv08349
Plaintiff:
Preston Earl Milks
Defendant:
Unknown Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland #302640 v. Simmons et al
as 2:2018cv04235
Defendant:
Unknown Simmons, Paul Penzone and Bill Williams
Plaintiff:
LaMonta Eugene Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
