Cases 11 - 20 of 1,147
Doe v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Clifford Harris and Tameka Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. City of Cypress
as 8:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
City of Cypress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dilbert v. Fisher
as 24-444
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD ALAN DILBERT
Respondent / Appellee:
R. FISHER
LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LeTip World Franchise LLC
Defendant:
Long Island Social Media Group LLC, BxB Professionals LLC, Clifford Pfleger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Graham v. Highberger
as 24-65
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD JOE GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA HIGHBERGER, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
