Cases 81 - 90 of 525
Lance Williams v. California Men's Colony et al
as 2:2020cv08282
Defendant:
C. Clifford, M. Leek, M. Bellrose and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01641
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Clifford J. Hill v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv07318
Defendant:
Eurostone America, International Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04546
Plaintiff:
Lowell Moss, Jr., Michael C. Wright, Wilda W. Adigwe and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Garner et al v.United States of America, et al
as 2:2020cv05717
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Robert Maeshack, Darren Williams and others
Defendant:
Dr. Felix Igbinosa, Chris Meyer, Dwight Winslow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 3:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, Deborah A. Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Poarch v. Randy et al
as 2:2020cv01191
Defendant:
Clifford Freeman, Lenick Randy and Robert Felix Brooke
Plaintiff:
Gregory Roosevelt Poarch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv03744
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams, Jeffrey Medley, Tammy Slaughter and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
