Cases 1 - 10 of 87
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC
as 3:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones and Brandy Jones
Defendant:
Praxis Landmark Recovery, Clifford F. Boyle Family Trust, 4Gen, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Portage Properties, LLC v. Sandcliff, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Portage Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Sandcliff, Inc., Roman Sandcliff, LLC and Clifford Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CLIFFORD v. TIPTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D CLIFFORD, JR
Defendant:
TIPTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford v. Tipton County Jail
as 3:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
William D Clifford, Jr
Defendant:
Tipton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Byroad et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Nicholas Matthew Byroad, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GODWIN et al v. HILL-ROM, INC.
as 1:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GODWIN, JUSTIN CARTER, BRIAN CRUSE and others
Defendant:
HILL-ROM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
