Cases 1 - 10 of 40
LEWIS v. MILBURG et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
LOREN CLYDE LEWIS
Defendant:
BRANDON MILBURG and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAUGHT v. COX et al
as 1:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
CLYDE D. VAUGHT
Defendant:
SGT. BRANDON COX, OFC. BEN LOUZON, OFC. ELIJAH ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
SALLEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
CLYDE SALLEY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GIBSON III v. NEAL
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLYDE GIBSON III
Defendant:
RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROCK v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BROCK
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPLEY v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2021cv02509
Plaintiff:
CLYDE SHEPLEY
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLOGG v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06506
Plaintiff:
CLYDE M. KELLOGG
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. HUYVARET et al
as 3:2021cv00095
Defendant:
CHARLES WHALLON, DOUG HUYVARET, JACK ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
CLYDE N. KELLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. WOODLAND et al
as 3:2021cv00091
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHELLE WOODLAND, CAPTAIN AMMON and DIANE PFEIFFER
Plaintiff:
CLYDE N. KELLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
