Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Cockrum et al v. C H Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01515
Defendant:
Howmet Aerospace Inc, C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc, Arconic Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Cockrum and Donna Cockrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Cockrum et al v. C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00969
Defendant:
Howmet Aerospace Inc, C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc, Arconic Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Cockrum, Donna Cockrum and Jeffrey L Cockrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05500
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Cockrum, Donna Cockrum and Jeffrey L Cockrum
Defendant:
C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc, P-G Industries, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COCKRUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58875
Plaintiff:
WANDA COCKRUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCKRUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47217
Plaintiff:
JAMES COCKRUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cockrum v. Saul
as 6:2020cv03371
Plaintiff:
Vicky Lynn Cockrum
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COCKRUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04233
Plaintiff:
ERIC CLIFFORD COCKRUM
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
