Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Thompson v. Chorito et al
as 1:2024cv02865
Plaintiff: Ezekiel B Thompson
Defendant: Chorito, Holgin, Rodway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01343
Plaintiff: Heather Cogdell
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cogdell Investors (Mallard), LP et al v. Helm
as 2:2023cv00654
Plaintiff: Cordell Investors (Mallard), LP, ED SUB-DCMH Limited Partnership, L.L.P., GA HC REIT II West Oaks MOB, LLC and others
Defendant: David C Helm, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARLOS v. NEIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv16485
Plaintiff: COGDELL CARLOS and CARLOS COGDELL
Defendant: NEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Dr. Daumer et al
as 3:2023cv00507
Plaintiff: Carlos Cogdell
Defendant: Dr. Daumer and Dr. E
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Wendorff et al
as 3:2023cv00495
Plaintiff: Carlos Cogdell
Defendant: Wendorff, Nurse Long, Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Andre Cogdell and Andre D. Cogdell
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cogdell v. Prock et al
as 3:2023cv00352
Plaintiff: Carlos Maurice Cogdell
Defendant: Prock, Whitehead and Whalin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00125
Petitioner: Carlos Maurice Cogdell
Respondent: Florida State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?