Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
BROWN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2011cv04690
Plaintiff: NAOMI L. BROWN
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03852
Plaintiff: JODY MILLER
Defendant: COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY INC. and MARGE KRAMER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Battle v.Collection Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02176
Plaintiff: Cameron Battle
Defendant: Collection Technology, Inc., Chris Van Dellen and Donald S. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00659
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00310
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00780
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Albert v. U.S. Dept. of Education et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv00540
Plaintiff: Kallys Albert, Sr
Defendant: U.S. Dept. of Education, Great Lakes Higher Ed Guaranty Corp and Collection Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04686
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2010cv03902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Traywick v. Collection Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01783
Plaintiff: Wayne Traywick
Defendant: Collection Technology, Inc. and Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?