Cases 21 - 30 of 33
THOMPSON v. CIESIELSKI et al
as 1:2012cv00375
Defendant:
PAUL CIESIELSKI, DETECTIVE MICHAEL CONDON, DETECTIVE JEAN DEDDISH and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boelk, Rob et al v. AT&T Teleholdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rob Boelk , Jerry Seger , Dave Jacak and others
Defendant:
AT&T Teleholdings, Inc. , Wisconsin Bell, Inc. , Ameritech Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. Taylor et al
as 3:2011cv03146
Plaintiff:
Harvey Scott
Defendant:
Patricia Smith, Roslina Robles Gonzales, . Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Condon v. Pickett
as 1:2010cv00971
Plaintiff:
Thomas Condon
Defendant:
Ryan Pickett
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Hazle v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv05609
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Hazle, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Superintindent Martinez, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch et al v. Huberman et al
as 1:2010cv01783
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynch , Josephine Perry , Maureen Callaghan and others
Defendant:
Ron Huberman and Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Condon v. Pickett
as 2:2009cv01203
Plaintiff:
Thomas Condon and Thomas Condon
Defendant:
Ryan Pickett
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Condon v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv02641
Plaintiff:
Thomas Condon
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Christopher Lindahl and Thomas Grimm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National City Bank v. Condon et al
as 1:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
National City Bank and National City Bank
Defendant:
Jeffrey Condon and Alexander Gross
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Condon v. Pickett
as 2:2008cv00814
Plaintiff:
Thomas Condon and Thomas Condon
Defendant:
Ryan Pickett
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
