Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sparkman v. Comerica Bank et al
as 2:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Paula Sparkman
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Conduent Business Services, LLC and Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Munoz, et al v. Conduent State & Local Solutions, et al
as 24-2044
Plaintiff:
ANA MUNOZ and MICHAEL TILLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC., CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC. and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Moscato v. Comerica Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
David J Moscato
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Munoz et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Anna Munoz and Michael Tilley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC., Conduent Business Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
MBC GROUP, INC. v. CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01869
Plaintiff:
MBC GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CFA, INC. v. CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
CFA, INC.
Defendant:
CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Farina v. Metropolitan Transportation Au
as 22-751
Plaintiff:
Jason Farina, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Charles Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Dorothy Troiano, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Koriszan Reese, Mirian Rojas and Brian Owens
Defendant / Appellee:
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, DBA MTA Bridges and Tunnels and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Transworld Systems, Inc., Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. and others
ANTONELLI v. CONDUENT INC. et al
as 2:2021cv18238
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONELLI
Defendant:
CONDUENT INC., TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Conduent State & Local Solutions, et al.
as 1:2021cv01749
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Watson
Defendant:
Conduent State & Local Solutions doing business as Direct Express Payment Processing Services, Comerica Banking, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc doing business as Direct Express Payment Processing Services originally named as Conduent State & Local Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
