Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Lentine v. FairPoint Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lentine
Defendant:
FairPoint Communications, Inc. , Paul H. Sunu , Edward D. Horowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.
as 1:2012cv01784
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GlobeTecTrust LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.
as 1:2012cv01239
Plaintiff:
GlobeTecTrust LLC
Defendant:
Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Broering v. Oldham et al
as 2:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jerome C. Broering
Defendant:
Steven C. Oldham, Kirk C Doyle, Guy R Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Consolidated Comm. Holdings v. FCC, et al
as 12-9530
Petitioner:
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Consolidated Commun. Holdings v. FCC, et al
as 12-1031
Petitioner:
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Atwater Partners of Texas LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Atwater Partners of Texas LLC
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Actiontec Electronics, Inc., ADTRAN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SALSGIVER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00663
Plaintiff:
SALSGIVER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SALSGIVER TELECOM, INC. and SALSGIVER, INC.
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. and NORTH PITTSBURGH TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
