Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07762
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
CONVERGEONE, INC. v. SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
as 5:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
CONVERGEONE, INC.
Defendant:
SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. LOGICALIS, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant:
LOGICALIS, INC., BEN HUDSON, MARK SMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Logicalis, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02151
Plaintiff:
ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant:
Logicalis, Inc., Ben Hudson, Mark Smalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Heartland Business Systems, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
CONVERGEONE, INC.
Defendant:
HEARTLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LLC, BRADLEY D ELLINGSWORTH and BRIAN M SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fixelle v. Convergeone, Inc.
as 0:2021cv61746
Plaintiff:
GARY FIXELLE
Defendant:
CONVERGEONE, INC and Convergeone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Convergeone, Inc. v. Yuneec USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00939
Defendant:
Firebird International, LLC, Yuneec USA, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Convergeone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Scardina
as 2:2019cv02565
Plaintiff:
ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Scardina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
