Cases 31 - 40 of 160
BALE v. HAMILTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., D/B/A CORIZON, LLC, MATTHEW LAWSON, EL HADJI NDLAYE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BALE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TYLER A. BALE, DECEASED and JAMES D. BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEPRIEST v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
JON DUKE DEPRIEST
Defendant:
CENTURION LLC, CORIZON LLC, JULIE L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beggs et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2019cv04227
Plaintiff:
Terry McIlvoy, Andre Boyd, William Beggs and others
Defendant:
Corizon LLC and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 7:2019cv02065
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Cardaro Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Pamala Swartz, Thomas Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winter (ID 56375) v. Mansfield et al
as 5:2019cv03236
Defendant:
Austin Dunn, Patrick Mansfield, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Winter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Payne et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Defendant:
Sharmila Suri, Corizon, LLC, Warden Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Corizon LLC et al
as 5:2019cv06146
Defendant:
Jane Doe 3, Tammie Christopher, Kelly Crisman and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Grace Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draper v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv06116
Defendant:
T K Bredeman, J. Cofield, Brenda Shira and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00997
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Dr. Erron Campbell, Dr. E. L. Toledo and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
