Cases 1 - 10 of 576
Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kendarius DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
St. Louis County and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 2:2023cv13138
Defendant:
Eric Stockall, Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Len Crump
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 4:2023cv12527
Plaintiff:
Victor Crump
Defendant:
Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor, White and others
Titus Willis v. Corizon Healthcare of Michigan, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS C. WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTHCARE OF MICHIGAN, aka Corizon Health, Inc., DUWANE WATERS HOSPITAL, INC., HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Oliver v. Corizon Healthcare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv12104
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cortez Oliver
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare Inc, Wellpath/Prarie Health Care and Ames
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01893
Plaintiff:
Bernard Campbell
Defendant:
Warden, Dr. Temesgen, RMD, Corizon Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
